https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394993 The court affirmed the Tribunal's decision that Rs. 22,40,000/- constituted the appellant's income based on seized documents and corroborating evidence from the appellant's partnerships. The court rejected the appellant's arguments regarding ownership of the document and jurisdiction under Section 153C, holding that the search encompassed the appellant's premises justifying assessment under Section 153A. The court upheld the Tribunal's findings, deeming them reasonable and dismissing the appeal for lack of legal merit. en-us Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394993 The court affirmed the Tribunal's decision that Rs. 22,40,000/- constituted the appellant's income based on seized documents and corroborating evidence from the appellant's partnerships. The court rejected the appellant's arguments regarding ownership of the document and jurisdiction under Section 153C, holding that the search encompassed the appellant's premises justifying assessment under Section 153A. The court upheld the Tribunal's findings, deeming them reasonable and dismissing the appeal for lack of legal merit. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394993