<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (5) TMI 25 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394992</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing procedural fairness and adherence to court directions. It directed the respondents to refund the interest amount collected under Section 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act from respondent No.3 on behalf of the petitioner, along with interest under Section 244A of the Act. The judgment highlighted the importance of compliance with court orders and the correct application of tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 May 2020 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (5) TMI 25 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394992</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing procedural fairness and adherence to court directions. It directed the respondents to refund the interest amount collected under Section 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act from respondent No.3 on behalf of the petitioner, along with interest under Section 244A of the Act. The judgment highlighted the importance of compliance with court orders and the correct application of tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>