<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (7) TMI 57 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22181</link>
    <description>Section 12(4) of the SAFEMA sets a mandatory appeal period of forty-five days from service, with condonation available only up to a sixty-day outer limit on sufficient cause. The Karnataka HC held that the Appellate Tribunal had no jurisdiction to extend limitation beyond that statutory maximum, so an appeal filed after sixty days was time-barred. Section 14 of the Limitation Act was inapplicable because the matter had not been pursued before another competent forum, and Section 5 could not override the special statute&#039;s express limit. The omission to mention the appellate forum in the order did not enlarge the prescribed period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:15:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61180" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (7) TMI 57 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22181</link>
      <description>Section 12(4) of the SAFEMA sets a mandatory appeal period of forty-five days from service, with condonation available only up to a sixty-day outer limit on sufficient cause. The Karnataka HC held that the Appellate Tribunal had no jurisdiction to extend limitation beyond that statutory maximum, so an appeal filed after sixty days was time-barred. Section 14 of the Limitation Act was inapplicable because the matter had not been pursued before another competent forum, and Section 5 could not override the special statute&#039;s express limit. The omission to mention the appellate forum in the order did not enlarge the prescribed period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>