<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 1368 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287759</link>
    <description>Tax appeal admitted on substantial questions concerning whether excise duty MODVAT had to be included in closing stock valuation under section 145A, and whether deduction under section 80HHC was to be computed on net interest rather than gross interest. The court framed both issues as questions of law for consideration, without recording a final determination in the supplied text.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:06:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611777" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 1368 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287759</link>
      <description>Tax appeal admitted on substantial questions concerning whether excise duty MODVAT had to be included in closing stock valuation under section 145A, and whether deduction under section 80HHC was to be computed on net interest rather than gross interest. The court framed both issues as questions of law for consideration, without recording a final determination in the supplied text.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>