https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287754 Confiscation proceedings were challenged on the ground that the statutory sequence required prior notice and adjudication under the detention and transit levy provisions before resorting to confiscation. The petitioner also relied on prior deposit of tax and penalty and sought interim protection. The HC considered these factors sufficient to grant ad-interim relief and directed release of the truck and goods, subject to an undertaking, pending further hearing. en-us Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Feb 2025 15:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287754 Confiscation proceedings were challenged on the ground that the statutory sequence required prior notice and adjudication under the detention and transit levy provisions before resorting to confiscation. The petitioner also relied on prior deposit of tax and penalty and sought interim protection. The HC considered these factors sufficient to grant ad-interim relief and directed release of the truck and goods, subject to an undertaking, pending further hearing. Case-Laws GST Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287754