<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 869 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394962</link>
    <description>The Advance Ruling Authority refrained from ruling on the taxability of various charges related to the supply and distribution of electricity as the issue is pending before the Supreme Court of India (Diary No(s). 24733/2019). The Authority cited the matter as sub-judice due to conflicting views from the AAR Rajasthan and the Gujarat High Court on the exemption of ancillary charges under GST law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 869 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, KARNATAKA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394962</link>
      <description>The Advance Ruling Authority refrained from ruling on the taxability of various charges related to the supply and distribution of electricity as the issue is pending before the Supreme Court of India (Diary No(s). 24733/2019). The Authority cited the matter as sub-judice due to conflicting views from the AAR Rajasthan and the Gujarat High Court on the exemption of ancillary charges under GST law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394962</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>