<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 849 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394942</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as the delay in filing the appeal for condonation was not adequately justified, with the explanation provided by the assessee deemed insufficient. The Tribunal found no merit in the grounds raised, citing the awareness of the disallowance under section 14A by the assessee as a key factor in the decision to dismiss the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2020 09:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 849 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394942</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as the delay in filing the appeal for condonation was not adequately justified, with the explanation provided by the assessee deemed insufficient. The Tribunal found no merit in the grounds raised, citing the awareness of the disallowance under section 14A by the assessee as a key factor in the decision to dismiss the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>