https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394930 The appeal was filed by the Regional Manager of Uttar Pradesh State Development Authority (UPSDA) against the Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) confirming order by the Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal found no allegations against UPSDA for committing scheduled offences or laundering proceeds of crime. The order was modified to exclude UPSDA from implications of possessing or generating proceeds of crime. The appeal was disposed of in favor of UPSDA, with the order standing modified to exclude UPSDA from being associated with the scheduled offences or proceeds of crime. en-us Tue, 28 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394930 The appeal was filed by the Regional Manager of Uttar Pradesh State Development Authority (UPSDA) against the Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) confirming order by the Adjudicating Authority. The Tribunal found no allegations against UPSDA for committing scheduled offences or laundering proceeds of crime. The order was modified to exclude UPSDA from implications of possessing or generating proceeds of crime. The appeal was disposed of in favor of UPSDA, with the order standing modified to exclude UPSDA from being associated with the scheduled offences or proceeds of crime. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 28 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394930