<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 835 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394928</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, granting the Appellants entitlement to a refund of Swachh Bharat Cess (SBC) paid on input services used for exporting services. The Tribunal relied on Section 119 of the Finance Act, 2015, and prior favorable decisions, concluding that SBC should be available as Cenvat Credit and refundable. The appeals were allowed, providing consequential relief to the Appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 835 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394928</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, granting the Appellants entitlement to a refund of Swachh Bharat Cess (SBC) paid on input services used for exporting services. The Tribunal relied on Section 119 of the Finance Act, 2015, and prior favorable decisions, concluding that SBC should be available as Cenvat Credit and refundable. The appeals were allowed, providing consequential relief to the Appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>