https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394924 The SC allowed the appeal and set aside the HC's permanent injunction that restrained the appellant from relying on arbitration clauses. The court held that despite different venue specifications in agreements, the domestic institutional arbitration under CIAA jurisdiction was valid as the same curial law applied. The respondent waived objections to arbitrator jurisdiction by failing to participate in proceedings and not raising jurisdictional challenges. The HC erred in setting aside the arbitration order, as the appellant's amenability to Alipore Court jurisdiction was not determinative for arbitration validity. en-us Wed, 29 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Jun 2025 12:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394924 The SC allowed the appeal and set aside the HC's permanent injunction that restrained the appellant from relying on arbitration clauses. The court held that despite different venue specifications in agreements, the domestic institutional arbitration under CIAA jurisdiction was valid as the same curial law applied. The respondent waived objections to arbitrator jurisdiction by failing to participate in proceedings and not raising jurisdictional challenges. The HC erred in setting aside the arbitration order, as the appellant's amenability to Alipore Court jurisdiction was not determinative for arbitration validity. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 29 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394924