<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 830 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394923</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s direction for FIR registration and investigation. The Court emphasized the importance of following the prescribed procedures under the Criminal Procedure Code, highlighting the distinction between civil disputes and criminal offenses. The decision did not express an opinion on the complaint&#039;s merits but underscored the need for proper procedural adherence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2020 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611656" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 830 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394923</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s direction for FIR registration and investigation. The Court emphasized the importance of following the prescribed procedures under the Criminal Procedure Code, highlighting the distinction between civil disputes and criminal offenses. The decision did not express an opinion on the complaint&#039;s merits but underscored the need for proper procedural adherence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>