<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2108 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287744</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed regarding the addition made on account of alleged bogus purchases, with the Tribunal upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reduce the estimated profit on the purchases based on established facts and judicial precedents. Additionally, the reopening of assessment under section 147 was confirmed, despite the original assessment under section 143(3), with the Tribunal supporting the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and decision, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2020 10:23:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2108 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287744</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed regarding the addition made on account of alleged bogus purchases, with the Tribunal upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to reduce the estimated profit on the purchases based on established facts and judicial precedents. Additionally, the reopening of assessment under section 147 was confirmed, despite the original assessment under section 143(3), with the Tribunal supporting the CIT(A)&#039;s findings and decision, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287744</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>