https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287735 Where a suit and appeal are prosecuted in a firm name, Order 30 Rule 4 prevents abatement on the death of a partner, so the omission to implead the deceased partner's legal representatives does not defeat the appeal. An opinion returned by a court on a special case under the first part of Section 13(b) of the Arbitration Act is only consultative for the arbitrators, does not finally determine parties' rights, and is not independently appealable under Article 136. In the trade mark dispute, the injunction was modified because the marks were treated as partnership assets and the appellants could not be wholly barred from use pending accounts and resolution of rights. en-us Wed, 22 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Apr 2020 10:02:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287735 Where a suit and appeal are prosecuted in a firm name, Order 30 Rule 4 prevents abatement on the death of a partner, so the omission to implead the deceased partner's legal representatives does not defeat the appeal. An opinion returned by a court on a special case under the first part of Section 13(b) of the Arbitration Act is only consultative for the arbitrators, does not finally determine parties' rights, and is not independently appealable under Article 136. In the trade mark dispute, the injunction was modified because the marks were treated as partnership assets and the appellants could not be wholly barred from use pending accounts and resolution of rights. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Aug 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287735