https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287734 The Supreme Court held that the appeal should not abate due to the death of proper parties in a tenancy eviction case where relief was claimed against the existing parties, not the deceased partners individually. As the deceased partners were only proper parties and no relief was sought against them personally, the Court clarified that their death did not necessitate substitution of heirs. Therefore, the High Court's decision to dispose of the appeal as abated was deemed erroneous. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashed the abatement order, and remitted the matter for disposal on merits, with costs to be borne by the respondent. en-us Wed, 07 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:57:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287734 The Supreme Court held that the appeal should not abate due to the death of proper parties in a tenancy eviction case where relief was claimed against the existing parties, not the deceased partners individually. As the deceased partners were only proper parties and no relief was sought against them personally, the Court clarified that their death did not necessitate substitution of heirs. Therefore, the High Court's decision to dispose of the appeal as abated was deemed erroneous. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashed the abatement order, and remitted the matter for disposal on merits, with costs to be borne by the respondent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287734