<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 513 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287733</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s judgment in favor of the respondent partnership firm. The suit was deemed maintainable despite the non-joinder of necessary parties as per Order XXX Rule 4 of the CPC. Additionally, the validity of the promissory note renewal was confirmed, holding the appellants liable for payment. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2020 09:53:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 513 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287733</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s judgment in favor of the respondent partnership firm. The suit was deemed maintainable despite the non-joinder of necessary parties as per Order XXX Rule 4 of the CPC. Additionally, the validity of the promissory note renewal was confirmed, holding the appellants liable for payment. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>