https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287721 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals against the High Court's decision to change the Investigating Officer in a criminal case. The Supreme Court emphasized that grievances regarding FIR registration or investigation should be addressed through the Magistrate under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, rather than through writ petitions to High Courts. The High Court's decision was set aside, directing the Magistrate to oversee the investigation and make changes to the Investigating Officer if necessary. The parties were instructed to present evidence to the Magistrate, who was directed to disregard the High Court's previous directives. en-us Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:57:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287721 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals against the High Court's decision to change the Investigating Officer in a criminal case. The Supreme Court emphasized that grievances regarding FIR registration or investigation should be addressed through the Magistrate under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, rather than through writ petitions to High Courts. The High Court's decision was set aside, directing the Magistrate to oversee the investigation and make changes to the Investigating Officer if necessary. The parties were instructed to present evidence to the Magistrate, who was directed to disregard the High Court's previous directives. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287721