https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287718 The criminal Court was deemed not debarred from proceeding with the private complaint for offenses under Section 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. The Court held that the Magistrate at Amritsar had jurisdiction to take cognizance of the offense, emphasizing the prevention of harassment and maintenance of judicial process integrity. It was clarified that the Magistrate could continue with the trial despite the timing of the document's filing, dismissing the appeal and affirming jurisdiction to proceed with the case. en-us Thu, 29 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:42:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287718 The criminal Court was deemed not debarred from proceeding with the private complaint for offenses under Section 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. The Court held that the Magistrate at Amritsar had jurisdiction to take cognizance of the offense, emphasizing the prevention of harassment and maintenance of judicial process integrity. It was clarified that the Magistrate could continue with the trial despite the timing of the document's filing, dismissing the appeal and affirming jurisdiction to proceed with the case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 29 Feb 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287718