https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287716 The court held that Mr. G's agreement with his client constituted professional misconduct, emphasizing the high standards of professional conduct expected of advocates. The court suspended Mr. G from practicing in the Supreme Court until the end of his suspension period in the Bombay High Court, citing his personal attacks on the Chief Justice as a factor in the decision. No costs were awarded. en-us Thu, 27 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:30:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287716 The court held that Mr. G's agreement with his client constituted professional misconduct, emphasizing the high standards of professional conduct expected of advocates. The court suspended Mr. G from practicing in the Supreme Court until the end of his suspension period in the Bombay High Court, citing his personal attacks on the Chief Justice as a factor in the decision. No costs were awarded. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 27 May 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287716