https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394921 Pending challenge to the levy under the post-GST regime and Rule 4 of the Madhya Pradesh Outdoor Advertising Media Rules, 2017, the HC required the petitioner to deposit the demanded amount with the Registry in fixed deposit within 30 days. It also restrained the respondents from taking coercive action until further consideration, thereby preserving the subject matter while the reply and challenge remained under scrutiny. en-us Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 17 Mar 2025 18:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394921 Pending challenge to the levy under the post-GST regime and Rule 4 of the Madhya Pradesh Outdoor Advertising Media Rules, 2017, the HC required the petitioner to deposit the demanded amount with the Registry in fixed deposit within 30 days. It also restrained the respondents from taking coercive action until further consideration, thereby preserving the subject matter while the reply and challenge remained under scrutiny. Case-Laws GST Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394921