<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 819 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394912</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer to determine if the appellant conducted independent research activities apart from using technology from Mahyco Monsanto Biotech. The AO was instructed to review agreements and allow the appellant a hearing. Both the appellant and Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2020 09:19:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 819 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394912</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the case back to the Assessing Officer to determine if the appellant conducted independent research activities apart from using technology from Mahyco Monsanto Biotech. The AO was instructed to review agreements and allow the appellant a hearing. Both the appellant and Revenue&#039;s appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>