<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 811 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394904</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty levied under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the transactions were genuine, carried out in the normal course of business, and that there was a reasonable cause for the contravention of Section 269SS. The decision was consistent with previous rulings in similar cases within the same group and legal positions clarified by higher courts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2020 09:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 811 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394904</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty levied under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the transactions were genuine, carried out in the normal course of business, and that there was a reasonable cause for the contravention of Section 269SS. The decision was consistent with previous rulings in similar cases within the same group and legal positions clarified by higher courts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>