https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394899 The Tribunal allowed the appellants' refund claims, overturning the rejection based on being time-barred and failing the unjust enrichment criteria. It was found that the claims were filed within the required period and that the appellants had not recovered the service tax from the recipient, meeting the unjust enrichment standard. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the entitled refund amount was granted to the appellants with consequential relief. en-us Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394899 The Tribunal allowed the appellants' refund claims, overturning the rejection based on being time-barred and failing the unjust enrichment criteria. It was found that the claims were filed within the required period and that the appellants had not recovered the service tax from the recipient, meeting the unjust enrichment standard. Consequently, the impugned order was set aside, and the entitled refund amount was granted to the appellants with consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394899