<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1725 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287708</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and deleted the additions made by the Assessing Officer under Section 50C for both assessees. It concluded that valuation for Section 50C purposes should be based on the date of the agreement to sell, provided part consideration was received by account payee cheque or draft before the agreement date. The appeals of both assessees were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2020 22:54:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1725 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287708</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and deleted the additions made by the Assessing Officer under Section 50C for both assessees. It concluded that valuation for Section 50C purposes should be based on the date of the agreement to sell, provided part consideration was received by account payee cheque or draft before the agreement date. The appeals of both assessees were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287708</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>