https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287705 Where the appointing authority fails to appoint an arbitrator within a reasonable time after a valid request, the aggrieved party may approach the Chief Justice or his designate under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The absence of an express statutory time limit does not prevent that recourse, and the Chief Justice or designate may directly appoint an independent and impartial arbitrator. A later appointment made by the defaulting authority after the application is filed does not displace that power and is ineffective. en-us Wed, 23 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Apr 2020 18:26:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287705 Where the appointing authority fails to appoint an arbitrator within a reasonable time after a valid request, the aggrieved party may approach the Chief Justice or his designate under section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The absence of an express statutory time limit does not prevent that recourse, and the Chief Justice or designate may directly appoint an independent and impartial arbitrator. A later appointment made by the defaulting authority after the application is filed does not displace that power and is ineffective. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 23 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287705