<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 796 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394889</link>
    <description>The Court disposed of the Writ Application, making the rule absolute to the extent mentioned. The petitioner was directed to establish that the show cause notice deserved to be discharged. The judgment emphasized the need for authorities to carefully consider contraventions and intent before invoking confiscation under Section 130 of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 796 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394889</link>
      <description>The Court disposed of the Writ Application, making the rule absolute to the extent mentioned. The petitioner was directed to establish that the show cause notice deserved to be discharged. The judgment emphasized the need for authorities to carefully consider contraventions and intent before invoking confiscation under Section 130 of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394889</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>