<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 790 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394883</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the addition of Rs. 5,00,000 made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A). The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to establish the source of the amount and the genuineness of the transaction, leading to the allowance of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 790 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394883</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the addition of Rs. 5,00,000 made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A). The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to establish the source of the amount and the genuineness of the transaction, leading to the allowance of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>