<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 781 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394874</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the assessee&#039;s claim under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act due to ownership of multiple residential properties, rejecting arguments regarding property condition and legal disputes. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the restriction on deductions for investments in multiple residential units, dismissing the appeal and confirming the levy of interest under Sections 234A and 234B as mandatory, in line with legal precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:42:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 781 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394874</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of the assessee&#039;s claim under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act due to ownership of multiple residential properties, rejecting arguments regarding property condition and legal disputes. Additionally, the Tribunal affirmed the restriction on deductions for investments in multiple residential units, dismissing the appeal and confirming the levy of interest under Sections 234A and 234B as mandatory, in line with legal precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>