https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287702 In an international commercial arbitration involving an Indian and an American corporation, the Court held that the arbitrator should be of a nationality different from either party. After failed efforts to secure a consensual replacement and the earlier arbitrator's unwillingness to continue, the Court rejected referral to the International Chamber of Commerce at Paris as unnecessarily expensive. Accepting Dr Nasim Hasan Shah's consent, neutrality, and willingness to sit in Delhi on the stated remuneration, the Court appointed him as arbitrator under Section 11(5) read with Section 11(9) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. en-us Tue, 31 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:31:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287702 In an international commercial arbitration involving an Indian and an American corporation, the Court held that the arbitrator should be of a nationality different from either party. After failed efforts to secure a consensual replacement and the earlier arbitrator's unwillingness to continue, the Court rejected referral to the International Chamber of Commerce at Paris as unnecessarily expensive. Accepting Dr Nasim Hasan Shah's consent, neutrality, and willingness to sit in Delhi on the stated remuneration, the Court appointed him as arbitrator under Section 11(5) read with Section 11(9) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 31 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287702