https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394869 The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal by including RS Software (India) Ltd. as a comparable company but dismissed other grounds. The Cross-Objection by the Assessee was partly allowed, excluding Persistent Systems Ltd. and Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd. from comparables. The Transfer Pricing Officer was directed to compute the Arm's Length Price based on the Tribunal's directions after giving the Assessee an opportunity to be heard. en-us Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:03:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394869 The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue's appeal by including RS Software (India) Ltd. as a comparable company but dismissed other grounds. The Cross-Objection by the Assessee was partly allowed, excluding Persistent Systems Ltd. and Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd. from comparables. The Transfer Pricing Officer was directed to compute the Arm's Length Price based on the Tribunal's directions after giving the Assessee an opportunity to be heard. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394869