<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 773 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394866</link>
    <description>NBFC status not disclosed during a securities trading transaction did not prevent treatment of the respondent as a corporate debtor where it contracted as a private company. An operational creditor&#039;s section 9 IBC application was therefore maintainable. Interim-relief proceedings under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, without commenced arbitration or evidence of a genuine dispute, did not establish a pre-existing dispute. Unsupported counterclaims and a feeble defence could not displace the operational debt. The insolvency petition was admitted, CIRP commenced, a moratorium took effect, and an interim resolution professional was appointed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:13:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 773 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394866</link>
      <description>NBFC status not disclosed during a securities trading transaction did not prevent treatment of the respondent as a corporate debtor where it contracted as a private company. An operational creditor&#039;s section 9 IBC application was therefore maintainable. Interim-relief proceedings under section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, without commenced arbitration or evidence of a genuine dispute, did not establish a pre-existing dispute. Unsupported counterclaims and a feeble defence could not displace the operational debt. The insolvency petition was admitted, CIRP commenced, a moratorium took effect, and an interim resolution professional was appointed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394866</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>