<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 770 - CESTAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394863</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed as the applications for condonation of delay, filed over seven years after the impugned order, were found to be highly time-barred. The appellant&#039;s argument regarding the Counsel&#039;s fault was not accepted, and the Tribunal noted that no appeal was pending against the impugned order. The High Court advised the appellant to seek the appropriate remedy before the suitable forum, resulting in the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2020 13:11:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611425" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 770 - CESTAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394863</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed as the applications for condonation of delay, filed over seven years after the impugned order, were found to be highly time-barred. The appellant&#039;s argument regarding the Counsel&#039;s fault was not accepted, and the Tribunal noted that no appeal was pending against the impugned order. The High Court advised the appellant to seek the appropriate remedy before the suitable forum, resulting in the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>