https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394861 Where a statutory appeal provides an alternative and efficacious remedy, writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be exercised unless the court records a reasoned basis for doing so despite that remedy. The writ court in this context was found to have noticed the alternate-remedy objection but proceeded to decide the matter on merits without first addressing maintainability, making the order erroneous. The available appeal mechanism was treated as an effective remedy against the assessment and rectification orders, and the writ petition was held not maintainable. en-us Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:58:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394861 Where a statutory appeal provides an alternative and efficacious remedy, writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be exercised unless the court records a reasoned basis for doing so despite that remedy. The writ court in this context was found to have noticed the alternate-remedy objection but proceeded to decide the matter on merits without first addressing maintainability, making the order erroneous. The available appeal mechanism was treated as an effective remedy against the assessment and rectification orders, and the writ petition was held not maintainable. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394861