https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394860 Where reassessment proceedings had already been completed for April to July 2009, a later notice and consequential order for the broader 2009-10 assessment year could not stand to the extent they duplicated the concluded period. The court confined interference to the overlapping period and declined to quash the entire proceedings because the remaining part of the assessment year had not been covered by the earlier reassessment. The challenge therefore succeeded only in part, with the reassessment quashed for April to July 2009 and allowed to continue for the balance period. en-us Fri, 03 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:56:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394860 Where reassessment proceedings had already been completed for April to July 2009, a later notice and consequential order for the broader 2009-10 assessment year could not stand to the extent they duplicated the concluded period. The court confined interference to the overlapping period and declined to quash the entire proceedings because the remaining part of the assessment year had not been covered by the earlier reassessment. The challenge therefore succeeded only in part, with the reassessment quashed for April to July 2009 and allowed to continue for the balance period. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 03 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394860