https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287695 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a transfer order, finding no strong case for interference. It emphasized the administrative nature of transfer decisions for employees, citing legal precedents that employees do not have a vested right to work at a specific location. The court noted the lack of substantial evidence supporting claims of victimization or mala fide intentions in the transfer order, ultimately ruling in favor of the administrative grounds for the transfer. en-us Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:51:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287695 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a transfer order, finding no strong case for interference. It emphasized the administrative nature of transfer decisions for employees, citing legal precedents that employees do not have a vested right to work at a specific location. The court noted the lack of substantial evidence supporting claims of victimization or mala fide intentions in the transfer order, ultimately ruling in favor of the administrative grounds for the transfer. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287695