<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refunds of IGST paid on Supplies meant for Export under Rule 96(10) of CGST Rules “Effective Date of Implementation 09.10.2018 OR 23.10.2017”</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9128</link>
    <description>The Explanation added to Rule 96(10) by Notification No.16/2020 CT (23.03.2020) was given retrospective effect from 23.10.2017, but on reviewing the sequence of prior substitutions and the Gazette effective date of Notification No.54/2018, the Explanation should instead be effective from 09.10.2018. Absent corrigendum, retrospective application risks recovery of IGST refunds from exporters who imported under Advance Authorisation and paid IGST while availing only Basic Customs Duty exemption; the author urges CBIC to withdraw or correct the retrospective dating to avoid litigation and hardship.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2020 06:19:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2020 06:19:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Refunds of IGST paid on Supplies meant for Export under Rule 96(10) of CGST Rules “Effective Date of Implementation 09.10.2018 OR 23.10.2017”</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9128</link>
      <description>The Explanation added to Rule 96(10) by Notification No.16/2020 CT (23.03.2020) was given retrospective effect from 23.10.2017, but on reviewing the sequence of prior substitutions and the Gazette effective date of Notification No.54/2018, the Explanation should instead be effective from 09.10.2018. Absent corrigendum, retrospective application risks recovery of IGST refunds from exporters who imported under Advance Authorisation and paid IGST while availing only Basic Customs Duty exemption; the author urges CBIC to withdraw or correct the retrospective dating to avoid litigation and hardship.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2020 06:19:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9128</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>