<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 761 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394854</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to categorize income from the sale of a property as long term capital gains rather than business income. The Court emphasized that the property had been rented out, listed as a capital asset, and lacked evidence of being treated as stock in trade. Based on factual analysis and previous court decisions, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:45:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 761 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394854</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s decision to categorize income from the sale of a property as long term capital gains rather than business income. The Court emphasized that the property had been rented out, listed as a capital asset, and lacked evidence of being treated as stock in trade. Based on factual analysis and previous court decisions, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>