<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (11) TMI 270 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287677</link>
    <description>An officer subject to all-India transfer liability cannot claim, as of right, posting near a spouse merely because of husband-and-wife posting guidelines. Regulation 47 of the Bank of India (Officers&#039;) Service Regulations, 1979 made transfer to any office, branch or place in India permissible, and the employee had also undertaken willingness to serve anywhere in India. The spouse-posting guideline was treated as a directory administrative policy, not an enforceable personal right, and had to give way to administrative exigencies, feasibility and the claims of other employees. The transfer to a preferred station near the spouse was therefore not legally enforceable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:23:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (11) TMI 270 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287677</link>
      <description>An officer subject to all-India transfer liability cannot claim, as of right, posting near a spouse merely because of husband-and-wife posting guidelines. Regulation 47 of the Bank of India (Officers&#039;) Service Regulations, 1979 made transfer to any office, branch or place in India permissible, and the employee had also undertaken willingness to serve anywhere in India. The spouse-posting guideline was treated as a directory administrative policy, not an enforceable personal right, and had to give way to administrative exigencies, feasibility and the claims of other employees. The transfer to a preferred station near the spouse was therefore not legally enforceable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287677</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>