<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 737 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287675</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging a transfer order moving the appellant to DRDE, Gwalior, from INMAS was dismissed. The court upheld the transfer&#039;s legality, citing Ministry of Defence guidelines and organizational needs. Allegations of malafide intent were refuted, emphasizing public interest. Judicial interference in transfer orders, especially for armed forces personnel, was limited, following established precedents. Concerns about the appellant&#039;s designation at DRDE were deemed unnecessary, given his promotion to Major General. The court found no merit in the appellant&#039;s claims and dismissed the appeal with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:16:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 737 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287675</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging a transfer order moving the appellant to DRDE, Gwalior, from INMAS was dismissed. The court upheld the transfer&#039;s legality, citing Ministry of Defence guidelines and organizational needs. Allegations of malafide intent were refuted, emphasizing public interest. Judicial interference in transfer orders, especially for armed forces personnel, was limited, following established precedents. Concerns about the appellant&#039;s designation at DRDE were deemed unnecessary, given his promotion to Major General. The court found no merit in the appellant&#039;s claims and dismissed the appeal with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>