<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 751 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394844</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order, upholding the deletion of additions on account of purchases from certain parties. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in treatment of similar purchases and upheld the decision based on past assessments and the inability to produce the parties for verification. The judgment was pronounced on 19/02/2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:11:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 751 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394844</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the ld. CIT(A)&#039;s order, upholding the deletion of additions on account of purchases from certain parties. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of consistency in treatment of similar purchases and upheld the decision based on past assessments and the inability to produce the parties for verification. The judgment was pronounced on 19/02/2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>