<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 750 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394843</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) to be invalid due to lack of specificity regarding the charge. Consequently, the penalty proceedings were deemed void ab initio. The Tribunal allowed the legal ground raised by the assessee, dismissing other arguments on the penalty&#039;s merits as infructuous. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:05:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611336" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 750 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394843</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty notice issued under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) to be invalid due to lack of specificity regarding the charge. Consequently, the penalty proceedings were deemed void ab initio. The Tribunal allowed the legal ground raised by the assessee, dismissing other arguments on the penalty&#039;s merits as infructuous. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394843</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>