https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287673 The Court upheld the transfer order of an Executive Engineer within the same station, emphasizing that interference in transfer orders is limited to exceptional cases like lack of competency or malafide intent. It ruled that adherence to government policy on transfer tenure does not confer a legally enforceable right. The Court found no evidence of malafide intent behind the transfer and affirmed the competency of the authority issuing the order. Judicial review of transfer orders is restricted, with the Court highlighting that administrative exigency is best assessed by the executive. Consequently, the writ appeal was allowed, and the writ petition was dismissed, with the stay order vacated. en-us Thu, 01 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Apr 2020 10:48:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287673 The Court upheld the transfer order of an Executive Engineer within the same station, emphasizing that interference in transfer orders is limited to exceptional cases like lack of competency or malafide intent. It ruled that adherence to government policy on transfer tenure does not confer a legally enforceable right. The Court found no evidence of malafide intent behind the transfer and affirmed the competency of the authority issuing the order. Judicial review of transfer orders is restricted, with the Court highlighting that administrative exigency is best assessed by the executive. Consequently, the writ appeal was allowed, and the writ petition was dismissed, with the stay order vacated. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 01 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287673