<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 422 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287671</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of transfer orders issued by the District Education Establishment Committee to lady teachers in Primary Schools in Bihar. The Court emphasized the Committee&#039;s jurisdiction to transfer teachers, even on their requests, and highlighted the importance of accommodating teachers to avoid hardship. It ruled that government servants have no guaranteed right to remain at one place and can be transferred in public interest. The Court cautioned against judicial interference in routine transfer orders, stating that such interference could disrupt administration. The appeal was allowed, the High Court&#039;s decision was set aside, and the petition by the teachers was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 10:32:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 422 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287671</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of transfer orders issued by the District Education Establishment Committee to lady teachers in Primary Schools in Bihar. The Court emphasized the Committee&#039;s jurisdiction to transfer teachers, even on their requests, and highlighted the importance of accommodating teachers to avoid hardship. It ruled that government servants have no guaranteed right to remain at one place and can be transferred in public interest. The Court cautioned against judicial interference in routine transfer orders, stating that such interference could disrupt administration. The appeal was allowed, the High Court&#039;s decision was set aside, and the petition by the teachers was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>