<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 738 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394831</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, directing a re-examination of the profit and loss account post-survey for accurate income assessment. The ITAT found the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the addition lacked concrete evidence and instructed a recalculated profit for the remaining period. The matter was remanded for further examination, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:37:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 738 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394831</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, directing a re-examination of the profit and loss account post-survey for accurate income assessment. The ITAT found the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the addition lacked concrete evidence and instructed a recalculated profit for the remaining period. The matter was remanded for further examination, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>