<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 732 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394825</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the appellate tribunal&#039;s order and directed it to decide the pending appeal within three months, emphasizing the parallel and independent nature of attachment and criminal proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The court criticized the tribunal&#039;s decision to keep the appeal in abeyance and clarified its authority to hear appeals against adjudicating authority orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:25:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 732 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394825</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the appellate tribunal&#039;s order and directed it to decide the pending appeal within three months, emphasizing the parallel and independent nature of attachment and criminal proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The court criticized the tribunal&#039;s decision to keep the appeal in abeyance and clarified its authority to hear appeals against adjudicating authority orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394825</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>