<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 730 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394823</link>
    <description>A concluded auction sale followed by issuance of a sale certificate ordinarily entitles the auction purchaser to the associated original title documents, and repeated challenges to the mortgage cannot be re-agitated to delay completion of the sale; the guarantor could not approbate and reprobate, so the writ challenge on that aspect was not to be entertained. However, documents relating to land already covered by an earlier final decree in favour of a third party could not be released, because that decree had attained finality and could not be ignored merely by reference to the broader sale description. The auction purchaser&#039;s entitlement was therefore recognised generally, subject to the decree-covered land.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 730 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394823</link>
      <description>A concluded auction sale followed by issuance of a sale certificate ordinarily entitles the auction purchaser to the associated original title documents, and repeated challenges to the mortgage cannot be re-agitated to delay completion of the sale; the guarantor could not approbate and reprobate, so the writ challenge on that aspect was not to be entertained. However, documents relating to land already covered by an earlier final decree in favour of a third party could not be released, because that decree had attained finality and could not be ignored merely by reference to the broader sale description. The auction purchaser&#039;s entitlement was therefore recognised generally, subject to the decree-covered land.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>