<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (5) TMI 371 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287664</link>
    <description>Pension escalation for erstwhile Burmah Shell management staff was treated as a justified parity claim, with the Court recognising pension as a vested welfare entitlement and taking note of the erosion in the value of money. It held that the mere inadequacy of the existing funded corpus could not defeat enhancement where similarly situated pensioners in a comparable public sector arrangement had already received a higher pension. The claim for restoration of commuted pension was not pressed, so the issue was confined to escalation only. The petitioners were held entitled to a pension hike at the same rate as that granted by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2020 12:14:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (5) TMI 371 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287664</link>
      <description>Pension escalation for erstwhile Burmah Shell management staff was treated as a justified parity claim, with the Court recognising pension as a vested welfare entitlement and taking note of the erosion in the value of money. It held that the mere inadequacy of the existing funded corpus could not defeat enhancement where similarly situated pensioners in a comparable public sector arrangement had already received a higher pension. The claim for restoration of commuted pension was not pressed, so the issue was confined to escalation only. The petitioners were held entitled to a pension hike at the same rate as that granted by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287664</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>