<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (4) TMI 706 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394799</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by deleting the transfer pricing adjustment on outstanding receivables, as the assessee, a debt-free company, did not require any adjustment. However, the disallowance of commission expenses was upheld due to lack of evidence supporting services rendered and necessity of commission for government contracts. The decision was pronounced on 18th February 2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2020 11:55:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=611243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (4) TMI 706 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394799</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by deleting the transfer pricing adjustment on outstanding receivables, as the assessee, a debt-free company, did not require any adjustment. However, the disallowance of commission expenses was upheld due to lack of evidence supporting services rendered and necessity of commission for government contracts. The decision was pronounced on 18th February 2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394799</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>