https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394791 The High Court declined to interfere in the matter as the appellant had a statutory remedy available before the Appellate Tribunal to challenge the impugned orders. The Court emphasized the importance of availing the statutory remedy and dismissed the appeal, noting that all contentions raised by the appellant could still be pursued before the Appellate Tribunal. The High Court clarified that issues of constitutional validity could be addressed by the Appellate Tribunal and that the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 is discretionary and equitable. en-us Tue, 10 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Apr 2020 10:53:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394791 The High Court declined to interfere in the matter as the appellant had a statutory remedy available before the Appellate Tribunal to challenge the impugned orders. The Court emphasized the importance of availing the statutory remedy and dismissed the appeal, noting that all contentions raised by the appellant could still be pursued before the Appellate Tribunal. The High Court clarified that issues of constitutional validity could be addressed by the Appellate Tribunal and that the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 is discretionary and equitable. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 10 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=394791