<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 72 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22120</link>
    <description>The High Court of Punjab and Haryana rectified discrepancies in a partnership concern&#039;s accounts related to trading activities, adding income for assessment purposes. In penalty proceedings under section 277 of the Income-tax Act, the court reduced penalties imposed on the firm and partners due to intentional lapses. While the trial court convicted the firm and partners, the lower appellate court acquitted them, emphasizing the lack of intentional wrongdoing. The court highlighted the importance of mens rea and the necessity of specific knowledge or intent for liability under section 277. Additionally, it considered the significant delay in criminal proceedings, ultimately upholding the termination due to prolonged delays.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:03:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 72 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22120</link>
      <description>The High Court of Punjab and Haryana rectified discrepancies in a partnership concern&#039;s accounts related to trading activities, adding income for assessment purposes. In penalty proceedings under section 277 of the Income-tax Act, the court reduced penalties imposed on the firm and partners due to intentional lapses. While the trial court convicted the firm and partners, the lower appellate court acquitted them, emphasizing the lack of intentional wrongdoing. The court highlighted the importance of mens rea and the necessity of specific knowledge or intent for liability under section 277. Additionally, it considered the significant delay in criminal proceedings, ultimately upholding the termination due to prolonged delays.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>