https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287633 Where a sanction order for prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act exists, alleged defects such as non-application of mind, absence of material, bias, or lack of competence are not threshold objections and may be examined during trial. Only complete absence of sanction can be raised at the inception. Once cognizance has been taken, the validity of an existing sanction may be left open for adjudication by the trial court, and the High Court need not interfere at that stage. en-us Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 Sep 2023 14:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287633 Where a sanction order for prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act exists, alleged defects such as non-application of mind, absence of material, bias, or lack of competence are not threshold objections and may be examined during trial. Only complete absence of sanction can be raised at the inception. Once cognizance has been taken, the validity of an existing sanction may be left open for adjudication by the trial court, and the High Court need not interfere at that stage. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=287633